After reporting on the deadly 2011 Queensland flash flood disaster, I spent a year documenting accounts of heroic rescues, tragic deaths and extraordinary survival.
Five years later, I returned for a follow-up study. I found some survivors had recovered, but many were far worse off.
This research suggests there is a long road ahead for survivors of the current bushfire crisis. However, there are key lessons to be learned.
Read more: The bushfires are horrendous, but expect cyclones, floods and heatwaves too
The initial response
At the time of the 2011 Queensland flood crisis, the Australian Defence Force arrived to help. Community spirit was high. Australia and the world donated very generously.
But after the first few weeks, initial assistance gave way to often intractable difficulties with housing, insurance claims, job losses and chronic physical and mental health conditions.
Blanket media coverage of the crisis soon dwindled. And for many people, there simply was no return to “normal” life.
Five years on
Five years after the event, many still struggled. The journey was far longer and more difficult for people who:
- lost family members during or after the disaster
- were traumatised by a near-death experience
- could no longer work in their old job
- had significant health problems
- had insurance claims that were slow, difficult or rejected.
Those people who were most able to recover were people who:
- lost possessions but who were not traumatised by the disaster
- remained healthy and had insurance with companies that promptly paid their claims
- were able to resume work
- were able to repair or replace their homes and return to a relatively normal life within a few months to a year.
After five years, some people realised they would never recover. Some said they would have preferred to die than endure the five years post-flood.
Several survivors spoke of the “near miss” they had with death. For some, it was an incentive to live every day with renewed gusto. For others, the near miss reinforced the fragility of life and left them feeling more vulnerable.
Death and near-death experiences
Thirty-three of the rescuers and survivors in the disaster experienced a near-death experience. Five years on, some of them had still not attended any counselling and reported memories of near-death experiences playing out in their minds in an endless video-loop. Some became hermits, afraid to leave home.
One of the rescuers told me it took five years to even acknowledge he had risked his life.
One mother whose children were at risk said:
Life as you know it changed on that day. You know that one second your life is normal and then how quickly things can change. I scan all the time. I scan rooms for the exit. I scan terrain in case something happens […] which is the quickest way to escape?
Lasting psychological impacts
Two thirds of the people interviewed still had ongoing traumatic memories five years after the disaster – including seeing or hearing the sounds of the disaster, smelling the fetid aromas associated with floods or feeling anxious at the sound of helicopters.
For some, the trauma triggers occurred only in the flood zone, while for others it could be anywhere, whcih meant moving away offered no respite.
In the small town of Grantham, where 13 people died, witnesses told an inquiry into the disaster that counsellors changed from week to week (meaning survivors had to retell their stories again to a new counsellor). The service then stopped because townspeople didn’t want to see them.
Return or move away?
Many people no longer felt safe at home. People who had to rebuild as property values fell and insurance premiums skyrocketed – some up to A$34,000/year – could not afford to insure their house. They feared a total loss of their homes next time.
Some people who never returned to affected towns fared better psychologically than those who did go back.
Some people returned initially, rebuilt, but then sold up and left again. Some told me they would not be alive unless they got out when they did.
Whole communities all but disappeared as almost the entire population left town.
Natural disasters are financial disasters
After a natural disaster, mortgages still need to be paid, even on houses that are uninhabitable. Accommodation costs mount. The risk of homelessness and bankruptcy increases and relationships can be put under enormous stress.
Property values in the towns and districts affected by the 2011 floods fell dramatically and immediately, meaning some people couldn’t sell and move away.
Several survivors were unable to return to their old jobs because their workplace had been destroyed or because it was too traumatic.
One who stayed to rebuild his business experienced another disaster two years later and lost his service station a second time. He rebuilt again only to have his business destroyed a third time the following year.
People who are injured at work in Queensland are eligible to claim on WorkCover, a government funded program that assists workers to recover and return to work. People injured in disasters, however are not eligible for the same type of assistance.
Many people relied on charities for food, clothes and shelter for months to years after the flood. Some refused or resisted charitable help or government help.
Some older people reported becoming dependent on their adult children for the first time.
What is needed
The research suggests several possible ways to help natural disaster survivors including, but not limited to:
- better access to publicly funded psychological care beyond the current 10 visits allowable under the current Medicare system, especially for people who have lost family or their home or business
- free and well coordinated government-funded counselling in disaster zones
- income support and emergency housing for people who have lost homes
- government-funded funerals for those who die in a natural disaster
- provision of short-term retraining for those who cannot return to their old jobs
- the creation of a “DisasterCover” system to support volunteer rescuers or firefighters with access to counselling, income support and job security – in the same way that WorkCover might support professional firefighters. A legislated scheme would mean survivors are not at the whim of ad hoc emergency government funding or relying on public appeals
- such a scheme could cover emergency medical, rehabilitation and wage costs and then claim them back, where possible, from the claimant’s private medical and income protection insurance
- improved land planning around where it is safe to build.
All of this sounds expensive. But the cost of not learning these lessons may be greater in the long run.
Amanda Gearing, Journalist, author, broadcaster, Queensland University of Technology
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
